Cancer Journal # 30 April 24
I got an email from Jan Carroll yesterday, noting that there had been no blog entry for a while and asking if things were OK. Bless the woman! Yes, things are fine. As I told her, nothing cancery has happened for a while. Which is not totally true. My PSA /# was checked on April 22 and it again came back as too low to be detectable.
I realize there is a certain absence of dramatic tension to my story. I can imagine an editor saying that it starts dragging at about pg.75. I say, "What about praying for those women, what about fitness training?" He says, "Don't confuse digression with narrative development. You've got a story to tell. Tell it!" The manifest injustice of this instruction stuns me into silence. That's just the thing. I don't have a story to tell! Unless there's a way to goose my PSA, I'm not gonna have a story to tell. So unless digression can somehow become the story, the reader may just want to find something else to read. But there are worse problems a cancer diagnosee can have.
So why not write about something else? We don't need a cancer narrative to read your blog, even though it is a Cancer Journal, but it can be that in name only. I'm sure you have other interesting things to say.
ReplyDeleteI tend to agree with you. The problem is the no-account imaginary editor who insists these things are digressions. What's a blogger to do? Maybe just get a new imaginary editor.
DeleteAbsolutely no worries if there are no cancery posts! :)
ReplyDeleteI too would enjoy reading whatever you feel inspired to post here!